Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mistWalker
I think it's actually a 60/40 split. No matter, it's rather ironic that, decades ago, the government broke up ATT, because they were a monopoly; in turn, this created many baby bells, and those same baby bells have resurrected the former parent, at least in name/brand.
|
I hope we all know that ATT and ATT Wireless are two seperate entities. Cingular bought ATT Wireless, not ATT. ATT had nothing to do with the Cingualr buyout of ATT Wireless couple years ago. I did read that ATT is in turn thinking about buying Cingular by buying BellSouth.
http://news.com.com/AT38T+to+buy+Bel...3-6046081.html