View Single Post
Old 02-18-2008, 01:46 PM   #9
rivviepop
BlackBerry Extraordinaire
 
rivviepop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: san francisco
Model: 8320
PIN: n/a
Carrier: t-mobile
Posts: 2,166
Default

RIM is squarely to blame - I have heard from more than one kernel developer that RIM drags their feet on getting them material (if at all), even after signing NDA contracts and so forth. RIM is the one to whom people should complain about no support, they aren't even trying to help out in a fastidious manner; coders are having to do everything by themselves (reverse engineering).

http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=120155944805973&w=2

Quote:
I really don't know, it's a wierd, undocumented little device from a company that ACTIVELY goes out of its way to not be helpful to Linux (my employeer has signed 2 NDAs with them, and they still refuse to give me any information, despite meeting everyone of their legal requests...)
Greg is a core kernel developer and module man, he wrote and maintains the berry_charge module for us.
__________________
[ Linux & BlackBerry ] http://www.blackberryforums.com/linux-users-corner/
Offline   Reply With Quote